Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment.

By D. Wiebers, J. Whisnant, J. Huston, I. Meissner, R. D. Brown, D. Piepgras, G. Forbes, K. Thielen, D. Nichols, W. O'Fallon and 5 more. The Lancet, 2003

3,624 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/110a6c28916479f732aaac98660ac403803c8943

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. Joanna M. Wardlaw
2. William Whiteley

In Neurology

1. Joanna M. Wardlaw
2. William Whiteley

Citations in the corpus

• CURATIVE ENDOVASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION OF CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS WITH THE PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE: THE BUENOS AIRES EXPERIENCE (2009, methodology): “According to the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (32) size classification, 33 (52%) aneurysms were small ( 10 mm), 22 (35%) were large (10–25 mm), and 8 (13%) were giant ( 25 mm) (32).”
• Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis (2009, background): “A major dilemma is whether to treat incidental brain findings and, if so, how. But the evidence is insufficient on what to do with most of them, partly because of the lack of controlled trials of their treatments and partly because the availability of MRI for only 20-30 years means that the long ter”
• Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. (2008, background): “Notwithstanding these diverse factors, most studies still base rupture potential primarily on the maximum dimension, with estimates of the critical size ranging from 5 to 10 mm (e.g., 50, 51).”
• Phase-Contrast MRI measurements in intra-cranial aneurysms in-vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields and wall shear stress: A comparison with CFD (2009, background): “Although most estimates of aneurysm-related risk are based on well-identified anatomic features, such as aneurysm size (3) or other morphological features [location in the posterior circulation, wide neck and presence of daughter sacs (4), or aspect ratio (5)], hemodynamic parameters are also though”