Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis

By Julie Grèzes, Jean Decety. Human Brain Mapping, 2001

1,545 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10d4b15a146b078d5ca02a284d57930aa18ac5d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy (2005, background): “In fact, involvement of MI in motor imagery has been found inconsistently in the literature probably for similar reasons (see Grèzes and Decety, 2001; Jackson et al., 2001).”
How Would You Feel versus How Do You Think She Would Feel? A Neuroimaging Study of Perspective-Taking with Social Emotions (2004, methodology): “…as the default mode of our mental functioning may account for the phenomenon that similar brain areas and computational processing have been involved during the execution of action, mental representation of one's own action, and observation of another's action (Grezes & Decety, 2001).”
Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions. (2005, result): “…extend into infancy (cf. Sommerville & Woodward, 2005) and are in keeping with research indicating a shared representational basis for self and other actions at both a computational and a neural level (Decety & Sommerville, 2003; Grèzes & Decety, 2001; Hommel et al., 2001; Meltzoff & Decety, 2003).”
The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. (2006, methodology): “More specifically, this circuitry involves supplementary motor area (SMA), pre-SMA, pre-motor cortex, the supramarginal gyrus, intraparietal sulcus and the superior parietal lobe ( Grezes and Decety, 2001 ).”
Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency (2001, background): “Common brain regions are involved during action generation, action simulation and action observation (for a meta-analysis see ref”
The role of prediction in social neuroscience (2012, background): “…preparation, online control, and imagination of one’s own movements are likely to correspond with, and be embedded in, the neural processes recruited in the prediction of action kinematics and action understanding, during observation of others during social interaction (Grezes and Decety, 2001).”
The role of MT+/V5 during biological motion perception in Asperger Syndrome: An fMRI study (2007, positive): “While deﬁcits in ToM abilities have been reasonably well established in autism (Baron-Cohen & Ring, et al., 2000b), one possibility is that deﬁcits in comprehending socially relevant information might stem from more fundamental perceptual deﬁcits involved in decoding social cues.”
Representing others' actions: just like one's own? (2003, positive): “…1999; Rizzolatti, Fogassi, & Gallese, 2001), posterior parietal cortex (Ruby & Decety, 2001) and the cerebellum (Grossman et al., 2000), are activated when an action is imagined or carried out as well as when the same action is observed in others (Blakemore & Decety, 2001; Grèzes & Decety, 2001).”
Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. (2006, result): “This result agrees with previous studies showing parietal, premotor, and cerebellar activations during observation of meaningless, intransitive actions [20, 22].”