The Entrepreneur's Choice between Private and Public Ownership

By Arnoud Boot, Anjan V. Thakor, Radhakrishnan Gopalan. 2006

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10d0e4e5ea3deac581e1e4c35855bef6eb343e38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Jie He
2. Fenghua Song
3. Thomas J. Chemmanur
4. Anjan V. Thakor
5. S. Lee
6. Yawen Jiao
7. Mike Burkart
8. X. Tian

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Fenghua Song
2. Thomas J. Chemmanur
3. Yawen Jiao
4. Mike Burkart
5. S. Lee
6. Anjan V. Thakor

Citations in the corpus

• IPO waves, product market competition, and the going public decision: Theory and evidence (2011, background): “, Chemmanur and Yan (2009), who analyze the relationship between product market advertising and new equity issues (IPOs and SEOs), and Stoughton, Wong, and Zechner (2001), who argue that the decision of a firm to go public may serve to signal high quality to the product market. 9 Our paper is also b”
• Incentives to Innovate and Financial Crises (2012, unknown): “Caballero (2011) provides an interesting discussion of the various factors at work in generating crises.”
• IPOs versus Acquisitions and the Valuation Premium Puzzle: A Theory of Exit Choice by Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists (2011, unknown): “The first strand is the literature on the going public decision (e.g., Boot et al. (2006), Chemmanur and Fulghieri (1999), and Maksimovic and Pichler (2001)), which focuses on a firm’s choice between remaining private and going public.”
• Corporate Governance and Regulation: Can There Be Too Much of a Good Thing? (2007, unknown): “Along the same lines, Boot, Gopalan and Thakor (2006) find that corporate governance controls may sometimes prevent management from doing what it should and thereby actually exacerbate agency problems.”
• Dual class IPOs: A theoretical analysis (2012, background): “Third, the effects of security-voting structures on firms’ financing and ownership decision (e.g., Boot et al. (2006), and Pagano and Roell (1998)).”
• One Share - One Vote: The Theory (2007, background): “Accordingly, they will be reluctant to go public when public capital markets stipulate strict corporate governance rules that impede their autonomy (Boot et al., 2006).”
• Relationship Banking, Fragility, and the Asset-Liability Matching Problem (2007, methodology): “Numerouspapers have employed heterogenous prior beliefs, including Allen and Gale (1999), Manove and Padilla (1999), Garmaise (2001), Kurz and Motolese (2001), Coval and Thakor (2005), Boot et al. (2006) , and Van den Steen (2004); see Kandel and Pearson (1995) and Tagaki (1991) for empirical evide”