The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale

By David Huffman, John M. Quigley. 2002

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10c4c38614faba544c32f9edd16a3dd25048eeb5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John V. Winters
2. Richard T. Harrison
3. Harvey Goldstein
4. Jason Henderson
5. Poh Kam Wong
6. S. Weiler
7. J. Drucker
8. Maw-Der Foo

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Richard T. Harrison
2. Harvey Goldstein
3. Jason Henderson
4. John V. Winters
5. Poh Kam Wong
6. S. Weiler
7. J. Drucker
8. Maw-Der Foo

Citations in the corpus

• Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges' evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition (2005, background): “Despite this limitation, business plan competitions are useful settings as potential investors use this opportunity to find and fund new ventures (Huffman and Quigley, 2002).”
• Entrepreneurs and Job Growth: Probing the Boundaries of Time and Space (2010, background): “Huffman and Quigley (2002) also found that government investments in high-quality higher education institutions were important in attracting and retaining human capital and entrepreneurial talent in the San Francisco Bay Area.”
• Towards a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems (2018, background): “These organizations produce cutting-edge scientific developments which spillover to over to nearby firms and act as training grounds for new generations of skilled entrepreneurs and workers and as magnets to attract highly educated workers to the region (Huffman and Quigley, 2002).”
• Human capital, higher education institutions, and quality of life (2011, background): “Higher education institutions increase the local human capital stock in at least two ways: 1) they increase access to higher education for local residents and make it more likely that local high school graduates will pursue post-secondary education (Card 1995; Alm and Winters 2009); and 2) they brin”
• Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches (2007, methodology): “Similar analyses have been conducted by Blackwell, Cobb, and Weinberg (2002), Huffman and Quigley (2002), and Glasson (2003).”
• The Economic Development Impacts of Universities on Regions: Do Size and Distance Matter? (2006, result): “Numerous researchers have investigated student migration patterns but have failed to produce consistent conclusions (e.g., Blackwell et al., 2002; Felsenstein, 1995, 1996, 1999; Goldstein & Luger 1992; Huffman & Quigley, 2002).”