Foreign Owners and Plant Survival
By Andrew B. Bernard, Fredrik Sjöholm. 2003
227 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10b208a939465f96d6e3bd58f24f758be2c979c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
- P. Goldberg
- Nina Pavcnik
- B. Javorcik
- Ernesto Freitas
- Ragnhild Balsvik
- J. Mata
- Jan De Loecker
- Zhiqiang Liu
Citations in the corpus
- Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms (2012, background): “…(2002) found that foreign banks were less efficient than their domestic counterparts, and other authors found that foreign firms exit more than domestic ones with similar characteristics (e.g., Bernard & Sjöholm, 2003; Colombo & Delmastro, 2000; Görg & Strobl, 2003; Pennings & Sleuwaegen, 2000).”
- Does FDI Bring Good Jobs to Host Countries? (2012, background): “These findings are based on figures from the United States from the late 1980s and 1990s examined by Bernard and Jensen (2007) and Indonesian data covering the 1975–89 period analyzed by Bernard and Sjöholm (2003).”
- Multinationals and Plant Exit: Evidence from Chile (2005, unknown): “Görg and Strobl (2003a) and Bernard and Sjöholm (2003) find that affiliates of foreign multinationals are more likely to exit than domestic firms when controlling for a number of plant and industry characteristics.”
- Trade, Inequality, and Poverty: What Do We Know? (2004, background): “Harrison and Scorse (2004a) investigate whether exporters and foreign-owned firms are more or less likely to comply with minimum wage legislation than domestic firms using plant-level data from the annual survey of manufacturers in Indonesia covering 1990-1999.”
- Is Labor Mobility a Channel for Spillovers from Multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian Manufacturing (2011, background): “Other explanations for the wage premium are that it is a compensation for a higher probability of plant closure (Bernard & Sjöholm, 2003) or higher labor demand volatility (Fabbri, Haskel, & Slaughter, 2003).”