INTERSPECIFIC AND INTERSEXUAL VARIATION IN ROOST-SITE SELECTION OF NORTHERN LONG-EARED AND LITTLE BROWN BATS IN THE GREATER FUNDY NATIONAL PARK ECOSYSTEM

By H. Broders, G. Forbes. 2004

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10a133d38df620a1210c43ef5789d2955a3e02a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. H. Broders
2. C. Garroway
3. E. J. Taylor
4. W. Ford
5. Joshua B. Johnson
6. Dana L. Thomas
7. R. Brigham
8. J. Gates

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Broders
2. C. Garroway
3. Joshua B. Johnson
4. W. Ford
5. R. Brigham
6. J. Gates
7. E. J. Taylor
8. Dana L. Thomas

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. J. Taylor
2. Dana L. Thomas
3. H. Broders
4. S. Woodley
5. I. Thompson
6. C. Garroway
7. G. Forbes
8. C. K. R. Willis

Citations in the corpus

• Movements and Resource Selection of the Northern Long-eared Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) in a Forest–Agriculture Landscape (2008, background): “The morphology and echolocation call design reflect a species with highly maneuverable flight, and a flexible gleaning and hawking foraging strategy (Broders et al. 2004; Faure et al. 1993; Ratcliffe and Dawson 2003), thus facilitating foraging in cluttered forest interiors.”
• Roost tree selection by northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) maternity colonies following prescribed fire in a Central Appalachian Mountains hardwood forest (2009, result): “Similar to previous studies, northern myotis maternity colonies on the FEF selected roost trees that were located on upper slopes, presumably because of increased intensity and duration of solar radiation (Lacki and Schweirjohann, 2001; Broders and Forbes, 2004).”
• Nonrandom association patterns at northern long- eared bat maternity roosts (2007, background): “Males tend to roost singly, whereas females gather at maternity roosts where they give birth and raise offspring (Foster and Kurta 1999; Lacki and Schwierjohann 2001; Broders and Forbes 2004 ); thus, our analysis is constrained to adult females at maternity roosts.”
• Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II (2006, methodology): “Paired samples were examined via matched-pair logistic regression (Weller and Zabel 2001, Powell and Steidl 2002, Broders and Forbes 2004), paired multivariate analysis (Aldridge and Brigham 2002), and Wilcoxon-signed rank tests (Powell and Collier 2000, Pechacek and Kristin 2004).”
• Range Extent and Stand Selection for Roosting and Foraging in Forest-Dwelling Northern Long-Eared Bats and Little Brown Bats in the Greater Fundy Ecosystem, New Brunswick (2006, methodology): “However, males roosted alone at trees and sites that were abundant (Broders and Forbes 2004) and could likely use torpor to maximize energy efficiency with less consequence for fitness than could the females.”
• Roost selection by male and female northern long-eared bats in a pine-dominated landscape (2007, background): “Similarly, Lacki and Schwierjohann (2001) found males frequently roosted in small diameter (mean = 14.4 cm dbh) trees and Broders and Forbes (2004) found males frequently roosted in trees 20 cm dbh.”
• Do social networks of female northern long-eared bats vary with reproductive period and age? (2010, background): “Female northern long-eared bats live in fission–fusion societies where individuals switch roosts almost daily (Broders and Forbes 2004; Foster and Kurta 1999; Garroway and Broders 2007; Lacki and Schwierjohann 2001; Sasse and Perkins 1996) and subsets of individuals maintain preferred associations f”
• Habitat Use by Forest Bats in South Carolina in Relation to Local, Stand, and Landscape Characteristics (2006, background): “In contrast, forest type is an important factor in the roosting behavior of many species including red bats and northern long-eared bats (Menzel et al. 1998, Hutchinson and Lacki 2000, Mager and Nelson 2001, Broders and Forbes 2004).”
• Social thermoregulation exerts more influence than microclimate on forest roost preferences by a cavity-dwelling bat (2007, background): “…and features of roost trees (e.g., height, diameter at breast height (DBH), canopy cover, etc.) are compared to those of randomly selected presumably nonroost trees (e.g., Vonhof and Barclay 1996; Brigham et al. 1997; Sedgeley and O’Donnell 1999; Broders and Forbes 2004; Willis and Brigham 2005).”