Social learning in fishes : a review

By Culum Brown, Kevin N. Laland. 2003

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/107dcfdc2527e7d397edea5f42b246ac79247eaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Individual olfactory learning in Camponotus ants (2006, background): “Social learning is appropriately defined, therefore, as individual learning occurring within a social context (Heyes 1993; Brown & Laland 2003).”
The effects of early and adult social environment on zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavior (2007, background): “As reviewed by Brown and Laland (2003), social experiences can influence fish antipredator behavior, migration, foraging and mate choice.”
The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio (2007, background): “Moreover, fish are known to be able to learn by watching others (Brown & Laland, 2003).”
Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes (2005, background): “…where bystanders extract information from aggressive contests between others and update their perception of the fighting abilities of these individuals based on the dynamics and/or outcome of the witnessed contest (McGregor & Dabelsteen, 1996; see Brown & Laland, 2003 for a brief review).”
Social experience in early ontogeny has lasting effects on social skills in cooperatively breeding cichlids (2010, unknown): “However, the presence of breeders and helpers 490 could have modulated fry behaviour through eavesdropping, a form of social learning that is 491 known to influence foraging choices (Brown and Laland 2003) and predator recognition 492 (Kelley and Magurran 2003) in fish.”
Establishment of new wintering areas in herring co-occurs with peaks in the `first time/repeat spawner' ratio (2010, background): “But often decisions are not made by independent individuals, but by groups of individuals that interact socially (see review by Brown & Laland 2003).”
Social preferences of juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris (2009, background): “These topics are of huge interest in other taxa ( Brown & Laland 2003 ) and could have important implications for sharks in the context of fisheries and ecotourism (Ferno ¨ et al. 2006; Laroche et al. 2007) which provide a fruitful field for future studies.”
An evaluation of current perspectives on consciousness and pain in fishes (2004, background): “Current work shows that learning processes demonstrated by fish are multifaceted phenomenon that have clear fitness implications to fish species at various developmental stages ( Brown and Laland 2003; Griffiths 2003; Hoare and Krause 2003; Kelley and Magurran 2003; Odling-Smee and Braithwaite 2003”
What makes fish vulnerable to capture by hooks? A conceptual framework and a review of key determinants (2017, background): “Naïve fish can learn to accept novel prey from observing experienced conspecifics (Brown & Laland, 2003) and therefore naïve fish should be capable of learning to avoid lures via observation; however, most research on social learning in foraging has focused on facilitation rather than inhibition…”
Impacts of domestication on angling vulnerability of common carp, Cyprinus carpio: the role of learning, foraging behaviour and food preferences (2013, background): “An alternative perspective is that cultured fish might be initially more vulnerable to angling than less domesticated individuals, but, with increasing experience, differences between the two groups might vanish owing to social learning effects (Beukema 1970b; Krause 1993; Brown & Laland 2003).”