The Comparative Politics of Carbon Taxation

By K. Harrison. 2010

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Cap and trade and carbon taxes offer the prospect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions at a lower cost to society than conventional regulation. Between these two market-based approaches, however, carbon taxes offer significant advantages, including transparency and predictability of costs, ease of implementation, and application to small and large sources alike. This article thus seeks to inform our understanding of the conditions under which carbon taxes are politically viable by comparing the experience of four jurisdictions: Finland and Denmark, which adopted carbon taxes; Germany, which adopted a related energy tax; and Canada, which rejected a carbon tax. The cases highlight the role of policy entrepreneurs in advancing academic theories about environmental taxation. However, the impact of those ideas was conditional on voters' attention to either the environmental or economic benefits of carbon taxes. Even then, business tended to be more attentive, thus winning tax concessions relative to household...

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1075da84c68378df008d0d030684944196c5ba75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. E. Lachapelle
  2. Christopher P. Borick
  3. B. Rabe
  4. K. Harrison
  5. Jessica F. Green

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. E. Lachapelle
  2. Christopher P. Borick
  3. B. Rabe

In Political Science and International Relations

  1. E. Lachapelle
  2. Christopher P. Borick
  3. B. Rabe

Citations in the corpus