Motors of sustainable innovation : Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems
By Roald A. A. Suurs. 2009
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/103a74b34babf0a93f125a076f0cdd764266ab32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Anna Bergek
- B. Walrave
- Staffan Jacobsson
- F. Hermans
- L. Klerkx
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Derk A. Loorbach
- Rob P. J. M. Raven
Citations in the corpus
- Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems (2016, methodology): “This relation then follows a ‘band-wagon effect’ (Geels, 2005; Suurs, 2009), where the rate of change in entrepreneurial activity increases, with a delay, the more entrepreneurial activity is installed.”
- Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies (2011, background): “While the evolutionary perspective has proved to be fertile and has lead to important further insights and new policy inspiration [3,4] it also raises the problem on how variation and”
- Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change (2017, methodology): “The TIS approach, for example, was and is used in various ways to structure policies for innovation pathways, evaluating the developed transition agendas, and formulating new policy interventions (50, 51, 144).”
- Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics (2019, background): “The methodological contribution lies in the application of a dynamic perspective of innovation system functions (Bergek et al., 2008; Hekkert et al., 2007) and innovation motors (Suurs and Hekkert, 2009; Suurs, 2009) for the purpose of policy evaluation.”
- Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008 (2010, background): “Although very small, these markets are strategic in terms of technical change since they create a base for learning and self-reinforcing processes which enable the new technology to begin to improve its price/performance ratio and to adjust to the demand from specific segments (Kemp et al., 1998; Ja”