Etiological paradigms of depression: The relationship between perceived causes, empowerment, treatment preferences, and stigma

By Benjamin Alan Goldstein, F. Rosselli. 2003

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10038ed6fdf6fe054a5664cdc9a6c5e5c7631110

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Vogel
2. G. Boysen
3. B. Deacon
4. N. Wade
5. Nursel Topkaya
6. Meifen Wei
7. Scott B. Martin

In Social Psychology

1. D. Vogel
2. G. Boysen
3. G. Baird
4. B. Deacon
5. Nursel Topkaya
6. Meifen Wei
7. N. Wade
8. Scott B. Martin

Citations in the corpus

• the ChemiCal imbalanCe explanation of Depression: reDuCing blame at What Cost? (2009, background): “…symptoms. research shows that participants express less blame toward individuals with schizophrenia (phelan, Cruz-rojas, & reiff, 2002) and depression (goldstein & rosselli, 2003) when their symptoms are attributed to a biological cause. similarly, mehta and farina (1997) found that allegedly…”
• EDUCATION AND MENTAL HEALTH STIGMA: THE EFFECTS OF ATTRIBUTION, BIASED ASSIMILATION, AND ATTITUDE POLARIZATION (2008, background): “For instance, biological beliefs are associated with perceiving people with schizophrenia as dangerous (Read & Harré, 2001), but the same does not hold true for depression (Goldstein & Rosselli, 2003).”