Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer

By J. Bauer, S. Capra, M. Ferguson. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2002

1,106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ffe4b1f413f9ce5744a95d30d64c937ed1cc1bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geriatrics and Gerontology

1. D. Gupta
2. C. Lis

In Physiology

1. Vickie E. Baracos
2. K. Fearon
3. D. Gupta
4. C. Lis

Citations in the corpus

• Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature (2010, methodology): “Among the most commonly used tools to measure nutritional status are subjective global assessment (SGA) [16-18], bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) [19], and laboratory measurements of serum albumin [20], preal-bumin, and transferrin [21,22].”
• ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. (2017, methodology): “Frequently used nutrition assessment tools like Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) [48], PatientGenerated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) [49,50] and Minimal Nutrition Assessment (MNA) combine qualitative and semi-quantitative data to yield a comprehensive “malnutrition score” [51] but lack sp”
• Sarcopenia in an Overweight or Obese Patient Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer (2009, methodology): “Patient-reported height, weight, and weight history were collected during this visit by use of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (12).”