Optimistic mirror descent in saddle-point problems: Going the extra (gradient) mile

By Panayotis Mertikopoulos, Houssam Zenati, Bruno Lecouat, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Vijay Ramaseshan Chandrasekhar, Georgios Piliouras. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Owing to their connection with generative adversarial networks (GANs), saddle-point problems have recently attracted considerable interest in machine learning and beyond. By necessity, most theoretical guarantees revolve around convex-concave (or even linear) problems; however, making theoretical inroads towards efficient GAN training depends crucially on moving beyond this classic framework. To make piecemeal progress along these lines, we analyze the behavior of mirror descent (MD) in a class of non-monotone problems whose solutions coincide with those of a naturally associated variational inequality-a property which we call coherence. We first show that ordinary, "vanilla" MD converges under a strict version of this condition, but not otherwise; in particular, it may fail to converge even in bilinear models with a unique solution. We then show that this deficiency is mitigated by optimism: by taking an "extra-gradient" step, optimistic mirror descent (OMD) converges in all coherent problems. Our analysis generalizes and extends the results of Daskalakis et al. [2018] for optimistic gradient descent (OGD) in bilinear problems, and makes concrete headway for provable convergence beyond convex-concave games. We also provide stochastic analogues of these results, and we validate our analysis by numerical experiments in a wide array of GAN models (including Gaussian mixture models, and the CelebA and CIFAR-10 datasets).

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ffb2d5bbbc4f2cc547569337bd20cc77c1111d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Tianbao Yang
  2. Michael I. Jordan
  3. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  4. Gauthier Gidel
  5. Peter Richtárik
  6. Ioannis Mitliagkas
  7. Qihang Lin
  8. Constantinos Daskalakis

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Michael I. Jordan
  2. Zhuoran Yang
  3. Alina Ene
  4. Huy L. Nguyen
  5. Tianbao Yang
  6. Gauthier Gidel
  7. Chi Jin
  8. Kaiqing Zhang

Citations in the corpus