Convergence of Learning Dynamics in Stackelberg Games

By Tanner Fiez, Benjamin J. Chasnov, Lillian J. Ratliff. 2019

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper investigates the convergence of learning dynamics in Stackelberg games. In the class of games we consider, there is a hierarchical game being played between a leader and a follower with continuous action spaces. We establish a number of connections between the Nash and Stackelberg equilibrium concepts and characterize conditions under which attracting critical points of simultaneous gradient descent are Stackelberg equilibria in zero-sum games. Moreover, we show that the only stable critical points of the Stackelberg gradient dynamics are Stackelberg equilibria in zero-sum games. Using this insight, we develop a gradient-based update for the leader while the follower employs a best response strategy for which each stable critical point is guaranteed to be a Stackelberg equilibrium in zero-sum games. As a result, the learning rule provably converges to a Stackelberg equilibria given an initialization in the region of attraction of a stable critical point. We then consider a follower employing a gradient-play update rule instead of a best response strategy and propose a two-timescale algorithm with similar asymptotic convergence guarantees. For this algorithm, we also provide finite-time high probability bounds for local convergence to a neighborhood of a stable Stackelberg equilibrium in general-sum games. Finally, we present extensive numerical results that validate our theory, provide insights into the optimization landscape of generative adversarial networks, and demonstrate that the learning dynamics we propose can effectively train generative adversarial networks.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Igor Mordatch
  5. Aravind Rajeswaran
  6. Ruslan Salakhutdinov
  7. Vikash Kumar
  8. Yoshua Bengio

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Trevor Darrell
  4. Chelsea Finn
  5. Dacheng Tao
  6. Li Fei-Fei
  7. Xiaogang Wang
  8. Jitendra Malik

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Zhuoran Yang
  3. Michael I. Jordan
  4. Praneeth Netrapalli
  5. Kaiqing Zhang
  6. Aravind Rajeswaran
  7. Igor Mordatch
  8. Vikash Kumar

Citations in the corpus