INTEGRAL/IBIS all-sky survey in hard X-rays

By R. Krivonos, M. Revnivtsev, A. Lutovinov, S. Sazonov, E. Churazov, R. M. Iki, Moscow, R. Mpa, Garching, Heidelberg · Germany. 2007

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results of an all-sky hard X-ray survey based on almost four years of observations with the IBIS telescope onboard the INTEGRAL observatory. The dead time-corrected exposure of the survey is ∼33 Ms. Approximately 12% and 80% of the sky has been covered to limiting fluxes lower than 1 and 5 mCrab, respectively. Our catalog of detected sources includes 403 objects, 316 of which exceed a 5σ detection threshold on the time-averaged map of the sky, and the rest were detected in various subsamples of exposures. Among the identified sources, 219 are Galactic (90 low-mass X-ray binaries, 76 high-mass X-ray binaries, 21 cataclysmic variables, 6 coronally active stars, and other types) and 137 are extragalactic, including 130 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and 3 galaxy clusters. We derived number-flux functions of AGNs and Galactic sources. The logN–logS relation of non-blazar AGNs is based on 68 sources located at Galactic latitudes |b| > 5 ◦ , where the survey is characterized by high identification completeness, with fluxes higher than S lim = 1.1 × 10 −11 erg s −1 cm −2 (∼0.8 mCrab) in the 17−60 keV energy band. The cumulative AGN number-flux function can be described by a power law with a slope of 1.62 ± 0.15 and normalization of (5.7 ± 0.7) × 10 −3 sources per deg 2 at fluxes >1.43 × 10 −11 erg s −1 cm −2 (>1 mCrab). Those AGNs with fluxes higher than S lim make up ∼1% of the cosmic X-ray background at 17−60 keV. We present evidence of strong inhomogeneity in the spatial distribution of nearby (<70 Mpc) AGNs, which reflects the large-scale structure in the local Universe.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ff5b3b33e1dd85fdce09e6954a0b479263b2a07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. Bing Zhang
  3. W. N. Brandt
  4. A. C. Fabian
  5. E. Treister
  6. F. E. Bauer
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. R. Hickox

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. W. N. Brandt
  3. F. E. Bauer
  4. S. Puccetti
  5. A. C. Fabian
  6. B. Gaensler
  7. F. Bocchino
  8. A. Comastri

Citations in the corpus