Competition for Food and Interference among Waders

By J. Goss‐Custard. 2015

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ff17b9921beede43572235f0a4fbbf503574e92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Ideal free distributions in fleet dynamics: a behavioral perspective on vessel movement in fisheries analysis (2003, background): “For smaller vessels, this would be a classic example of interference resulting from prey behavior (Goss-Custard 1980).”
Competitive interactions among beam trawlers exploiting local patches of flatfish in the North Sea (2000, background): “Due to competitive interactions, the capture rate may fall disproportional with density of prey (Goss-Custard, 1980; Ens and Goss-Custard, 1984; Milinski and Parker, 1991).”
Do tigers displace leopards? If so, why? (2010, background): “Instead, one species imposes a cost on an inferior competitor by limiting its foraging ability through a process termed interference competition (Goss-Custard 1980; Creel et al. 2001).”
An experiment on effort allocation of fishing vessels: the role of interference competition and area specialization (2007, result): “In contrast to animal studies in which the interference interactions among foraging individuals can be observed directly (Goss-Custard 1980), interference competition among fishing vessels is more difficult to study quantitatively.”
Context dependence of personalities: risk-taking behavior in a social and a nonsocial situation (2005, background): “However because group living also increases competition for food (Goss-Custard, 1980), certain individuals might be more willing to take risks than others to beable get their share of the available resources (Grand and Dill, 1999).”
The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders (2005, background): “Interference competition, however, can be just as relevant (Goss-Custard, 1980) because behavioral interactions can be very costly (either directly, through injury or loss of energy or time, or indirectly, through a reduction in intake rate).”
The effects of human presence, flock size and prey density on shorebird foraging rates (2005, background): “Larger flocks may be more likely to disrupt prey and cause a temporary reduction in amphipod availability due to the avoidance response of the prey (Goss-Custard 1980; Stillman et al. 1996; Triplet et al. 1999).”
Group-size and distance-to-neighbour effects on feeding and vigilance in brown-headed cowbirds (2007, background): “Similarly, the expected increase in feeding rate with group size may be masked by a decrease in local food availability caused by the activity of companions or by an increase in competition for limited resources (Charnov et al. 1976; Goss-Custard 1980).”
Spatially explicit, individual-based, behavioural models of the annual cycle of two migratory goose populations (2000, background): “Yet, the size of a local population on such a site depends heavily on the quality, extent and proximity of alternative habitats as well as the overall number of birds, or the greater population, competing for them (Goss-Custard 1993). The results of Baillie et al. (2000) provide another illustration”