The effects of human presence, flock size and prey density on shorebird foraging rates

By M. Yasué. Journal of ethology, 2005

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change (2011, background): “While some species have learned to ignore humans, others do not seem to habituate to increased human disturbance, which leads to dramatic decreases in fitness (Kerley et al. 2002; Thomas et al. 2003; Yasue 2005).”
Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: Response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance (2011, background): “Internationally, FID data are available for a selection of birds, owever, FIDs do not appear to be readily transferable across pecies (Gill, 2007; Holmes, Giese, & Kriwoken, 2005; Yasue, 2005).”
Flock size and human disturbance affect vigilance of endangered red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis) (2011, background): “, 2000), at given group sizes (Yasue, 2005), for one sex (Dyck and Baydack, 2004) or in particular years (Burger and Gochfeld, 1991).”
Approaches to measuring the effects of human disturbance on birds (2007, unknown): “2005, Yasue 2005, Burton 2007).”