Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.
By Timothy T. Rogers, M. L. Lambon Ralph, Peter Garrard, Sasha Bozeat, James L. McClelland, John R. Hodges, Karalyn Patterson. Psychology Review, 2004
930 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fe48b35848a178ef5f52f03b64b25aa70acd76a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- M. L. Lambon Ralph
- Friedemann Pulvermüller
- Franklin Chang
- James L. McClelland
- Elizabeth Jefferies
- Markus Kiefer
- Gary S. Dell
- Andrew Kyle Lampinen
Citations in the corpus
- Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes (2010, background): “, word-picture matching) (9) but also in naming (29), where the rate of such errors is influenced by typicality as well as familiarity (30).”
- A Connectionist Approach to Embodied Conceptual Metaphor (2010, background): “This work has led to more biologically plausible models of semantic dementia that highlight the specific role multimodal integration layers in the anterior temporal lobes play in semantic representation (Rogers et al., 2004).”
- Non-verbal sound processing in the primary progressive aphasias (2009, neutral): “Cortical processing of complex sound information need not be exclusively serial: indeed, interactions between different processing stages are likely on both theoretical and empirical grounds (Griffiths and Warren, 2004; Rogers et al., 2004; Kveraga et al., 2007).”
- Précis of Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach (2008, background): “Distinctions between items that are very similar semantically tend to be lost as a result of damage to this area, whereas distinctions between highly dissimilar area concepts are maintained (Rogers et al. 2004).”
- Integration of New Information in Memory: New Insights from a Complementary Learning Systems Perspective (2020, background): “Subsequent work [19, 20] showed how this model could account for many aspects of the developmental progression of semantic knowledge acquisition, as well as the disintegration of such knowledge as a function of brain damage, thought to reduce the fidelity of the learned representations of concepts t”
- Extending Machine Language Models toward Human-Level Language Understanding (2019, background): “Models that capture these findings (43) treat this area as the hidden layer of an interactive, recurrent network with bidirectional connections to other layers corresponding to brain areas that represent different types of object properties including the object’s name.”
- Visual Information in Semantic Representation (2010, background): “It is unlikely that we have separate representations for different aspects of word meaning (Rogers et al., 2004).”
- Semantic Processing in the Anterior Temporal Lobes: A Meta-analysis of the Functional Neuroimaging Literature (2010, background): “…some researchers consider the ATLs to form a “semantic hub” (Lambon Ralph et al., 2009; Lambon Ralph & Patterson, 2008; Patterson et al., 2007; Rogers et al., 2004), whereas other influential models of the neural basis of semantic memory do not ascribe a key role to this brain region…”
- Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. (2006, methodology): “Accordingly, Rogers et al. (2004) implemented a computational model of this anterior temporal lobe system in which semantic representations were formed through the distillation of information required for mappings between different verbal and non-verbal modalities.”
- Becoming syntactic. (2006, background): “…distinct functions, frontal areas being associated more with syntax and sequential output (Botvinick & Plaut, 2004; Keele, Ivry, Mayr, Hazeltine, & Heuer, 2003; Petersson, Forkstam, & Ingvar, 2004), and temporal–parietal areas being the locus of stored lexical representations (Rogers et al., 2004).”
- Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. (2012, background): “…(Rumelhart and McClelland, 1986), conceptual representations depend on an activation pattern of all neuron-like processing units within a network section, a so-called “layer” (Devlin et al., 1998; McClelland and Rogers, 2003; Rogers et al., 2004; Tyler and Moss, 2001; Caramazza et al., 1990).”