Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of Co2 Abatement Policies: What Does it Cost?

By L. Goulder. 2000

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fd79d5622313d508f2c15df41531dbf7db98859

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy (2008, unknown): “This reflects the fact that regulated utilities cannot pass forward the market value of freely allocated permits through higher generation prices.”
The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices (2006, background): “Bovenberg and Goulder (2000) came to similar conclusions in research on the coal, oil and gas industries in the USA.”
Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market (2013, methodology): “Columns (3) and (4) examine the big event window consisting of five days prior and 25 days after April 25, 2006 and perform the same analysis as (5).”
Are Emissions Permits Regressive (2004, methodology): “three independent calibrations) using simulation results from Haiku, a detailed model of the electricity market discussed in Burtraw et al. (2001), Carlson et al. (2000), Banzhaf et al.”
Distributional effects of carbon taxation (2016, background): “In addition, not only the carbon tax but also the cap-and-trade mechanisms have such potential uneven distributional effect across sectors [90,91].”
Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences (2002, background): “Bovenberg and Goulder (2000) as well as the U.S. Congressional budget office (2000) have demonstrated that the complete grandfathering of CO2 upstream permits in the U.S. would let fossil fuel firms better off, and not worse off. Indeed, the gain from the scarcity rent would be much greater than the”
The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances (2002, result): “economy find similar results on a sectoral basis (Smith and Ross, 2002; Bovenberg and Goulder, 2001).”