Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment

By Chris J. Johnson, K. Parker, D. Heard, M. Gillingham. 2002

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fa5044c212bd8fbe0a0c17320ae6bafff538631

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review (2009, background): “For example, much effort has gone into modeling the spatial usage of endangered ungulates (Mladenoff et al. 1999, Johnson et al. 2002, Morales et al. 2005).”
Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes (2005, background): “Movement paths of large herbivores are usually characterized by an alternation between relatively small movements and larger scale excursions (Bailey et al. 1996; Pastor et al. 1997; Johnson et al. 2002; Frair et al. 2004; Morales et al. 2004).”
Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal (2007, unknown): “…explorative-type of movements within habitats differ from movements observed in the matrix, between suitable resource or habitat patches (e.g., Baars 1979; Schultz 1998; Doncaster et al. 2001; Goodwin and Fahrig 2002; Johnson et al. 2002; Baguette 2003; Hein et al. 2005; Schtickzelle et al. 2007).”
Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success (2014, background): “The rapid development of movement recording technologies, which enables managers to collect movement data on various spatial and temporal scales with increasing ease (Johnson et al., 2002; Cagnacci et al., 2010), has made the employment of tracking devices on released individuals a common practice (”
Space use of moose in relation to food availability (2005, background): “Movement rate of moose was assessed as the Euclidean distance between successive locations of an individual divided by the time elapsed between those two locations (Courtois and Crête 1988; Johnson et al. 2002).”
EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS (2004, background): “This is in contrast to the case of multiple 3 exponential distributions used by Johnson et al. (2002) in which the mode of the step 4 length distribution for both small and large-scale movements is the same and very small.”
Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies (2004, background): “large-scale movements (Johnson et al. 2002), or for certain time periods, e.”
Inference of Animal Activity From GPS Collar Data on Free-Ranging Cattle (2005, background): “…are moose (Rodgers and Anson 1994; Rempel et al. 1995; Moen et al. 1996a, 1996b; Dussault et al. 1999; Girard et al. 2002), deer (Blanc and Brelurut 1997; Merrill et al. 1998; Bowman et al. 2000), elk (Biggs et al. 2001), caribou (Johnson et al. 2002a, 2002b), and elephant (Blake et al. 2001).”
Scale‐dependent habitat use in a long‐ranging central place predator (2005, background): “…environment and foraging decisions are thus scale-dependent, and could lead to difference in individuals (Rettie & Messier 862 D. Pinaud & H. Weimerskirch © 2005 British Ecological Society, Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 852–863 2000; Johnson et al. 2002), with a repercussion on individual fitness.”
Do fences create an edge-effect on the movement patterns of a highly mobile mega-herbivore? (2010, background): “Clair, 2004), foraging routes (Crist et al., 1992; Johnson et al., 2002), and home range use (Bailey et al.”