Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy
By B. Domon, R. Aebersold. Nature Biotechnology, 2010
625 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f9e801918ffeb00ea8902e7e0afde45883a6a11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Matthias Mann
- Jüergen Cox
- R. Aebersold
- Christoph Schaab
- T. Geiger
- Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
- Ludovic C. Gillet
- Michael J. MacCoss
In Spectroscopy
- Jüergen Cox
- Matthias Mann
- R. Aebersold
- Christoph Schaab
- T. Geiger
- Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
- Ludovic C. Gillet
- Michael J. MacCoss
Citations in the corpus
- The Skyline Ecosystem: Informatics for Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Proteomics (2017, background): “The type of acquisition influences the selectivity, reproducibility, repeatability, limit of detection, dynamic range, and data density of the assay (Domon and Aebersold 2010).”
- Analysis of High Accuracy, Quantitative Proteomics Data in the MaxQB Database (2012, background): “During the last few years, measurements have increasingly been performed in a high resolution, quantitative format (1–3).”
- Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* (2012, background): “Both methods have different and largely complementary preferred uses and performance profiles that have been extensively discussed elsewhere (10).”