Indicating ecosystem and landscape organisation

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets (2012, methodology): “This self-organizing capacity is based on structures and processes in ecosystems, and appropriate indicators for their description have been defined and applied in several case studies (Müller, 2005; Burkhard and Müller, 2008).”
Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification (2014, methodology): “In our work, we use an approach based on the most commonly applied three ecosystem service categories (regulating, provisioning, cultural services) adding ecosystem functions (structures and processes relevant for ecosystem self-organisation; see concept of ecological integrity; Müller 2005).”
Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments (2009, methodology): “In the assessment framework presented here, ecological integrity and related indicators (Müller 2005) represent the base for the provision of regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem services.”
‘The Matrix Reloaded': A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services (2015, background): “Since both systems are highly complex (Weaver, 1948; Muller, 2005), the characterization of the interdependencies of social-ecological systems based on the ecosystem service concept has a descriptive as well as a normative dimension (Abson et al., 2014).”