Asymptotics of Selective Inference
By Xiaoying Tian, Jonathan E. Taylor. 2015
71 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this paper, we seek to establish asymptotic results for selective inference procedures removing the assumption of Gaussianity. The class of selection procedures we consider are determined by affine inequalities, which we refer to as affine selection procedures. Examples of affine selection procedures include selective inference along the solution path of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), as well as selective inference after fitting the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator at a fixed value of the regularization parameter. We also consider some tests in penalized generalized linear models. Our result proves asymptotic convergence in the high‐dimensional setting where n
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Control and Systems Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f74aac5679b330d68a5da31e607092ae895a23d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Jonathan E. Taylor
- Robert Tibshirani
- M. G'Sell
- Sangwon Hyun
- Dennis L. Sun
- William Fithian
- Xiaoying Tian
- Trevor J. Hastie
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Robert Tibshirani
- Jonathan E. Taylor
- M. G'Sell
- Xiaoying Tian
- William Fithian
- Sangwon Hyun
- Dennis L. Sun
- Stefan Wager
In Statistics and Probability
- Robert Tibshirani
- Jonathan E. Taylor
- M. G'Sell
- Sangwon Hyun
- Xiaoying Tian
- William Fithian
- Dennis L. Sun
- J. Marković
Citations in the corpus
- Selective inference with a randomized response (2015, background): “In the saturated model, our result provides a finer measure of convergence than in Tian and Taylor (2015).”
- Optimal Inference After Model Selection (2014, methodology): “ck the robustness of data carving, we replace the Gaussian errors with independent errors drawn from Student’s tdistribution with ve degrees of freedom. The numbers barely change at all; see Table 2. Tian and Taylor (2017) rigorously analyze the case of non-Gaussian errors. 8 Conditioning as a Devic”
- Exact post-selection inference for the generalized lasso path (2018, methodology): “Asymptotics for non-Gaussian error distributions are presented in Tian and Taylor [33], Tibshirani et al. [36].”
- More powerful post-selection inference, with application to the Lasso (2018, background): “In the regime where p is fixed and n is growing, these assumptions can be dispensed with: • Tibshirani et al. (2014), Tian & Taylor (2017) show that the truncated normal pivot underlying the TZMs method holds asymptotically for a wide class of (non-normal) error distributions.”