Selective inference with a randomized response

By Xiaoying Tian, Jonathan E. Taylor. 2015

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Inspired by sample splitting and the reusable holdout introduced in the field of differential privacy, we consider selective inference with a randomized response. We discuss two major advantages of using a randomized response for model selection. First, the selectively valid tests are more powerful after randomized selection. Second, it allows consistent estimation and weak convergence of selective inference procedures. Under independent sampling, we prove a selective (or privatized) central limit theorem that transfers procedures valid under asymptotic normality without selection to their corresponding selective counterparts. This allows selective inference in nonparametric settings. Finally, we propose a framework of inference after combining multiple randomized selection procedures. We focus on the classical asymptotic setting, leaving the interesting high-dimensional asymptotic questions for future work.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13594c3d461984009c5464179b89637bb691e964

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Robert Tibshirani
  2. M. G'Sell
  3. Jing Lei
  4. Jonathan E. Taylor
  5. E.J. Candes
  6. Larry A. Wasserman
  7. Sangwon Hyun
  8. Alessandro Rinaldo

Citations in the corpus