Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment

599 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use (2019, background): “In reference to e-government, Coursey and Norris (2008) advocate the existence of a “ field of dreams ” perspective, stating that governments generally develop web applications with no consideration of real citizen demand.”
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews (2019, result): “This is in line with a lot of criticism, as for example Coursey and Norris (2008) state that the predictions of the various models on e-government hardly correspond with empirical findings because the concepts' definitions itself lack an empirical grounding.”
A Three‐Stage Adoption Process for Social Media Use in Government (2013, background): “A critical review of several such staged models applied to e-government is provided by Coursey and Norris (2008).”
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA) (2017, background): “As a number of studies (e.g. Coursey & Norris, 2008; Chan et al., 2011; Dwivedi et al., 2012; Hardy & Williams, 2011; Heeks & Bailur, 2007; Norris & Lloyd, 2006) have acknowledged the theoretical fragmentation or lack of theoretical development and rigor in the egovernment adoption research, this…”