Effects of predator-specific defence on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities

By Hiroyuki Matsuda, M. Hori, P. Abrams. Evolutionary Ecology, 2005

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

CONNECTING THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF TRAIT‐MEDIATED INTERACTIONS (2003, background): “However, if the presence of a predator stops prey from overexploiting resources, increased densities of one prey type can cause the density of the other prey type to increase (Abrams 1992b, Abrams and Matsuda 1996).”
Consequences of behavioral dynamics for the population dynamics of predator-prey systems with switching (2004, methodology): “In many cases, the Lagrange Multiplier approach used in Matsuda et al. (1996) can be used to extend the two-prey model to situations with more prey species.”
Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology (2009, background): “…defense or offense and have concluded that both types of plasticity can stabilize predator-prey population dynamics (Abrams 1984, 1992, 1995; Matsuda et al. 1993, 1994, 1996; Abrams and Matsuda 1997; Bolker et al. 2003; Kondoh 2003, 2007; Ramos-Jiliberto 2003; Vos et al. 2004a,b; Kopp and…”
A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES (2003, background): “11) The evolutionary implications of these interactions are virtually unexplored (but see Matsuda et al. 1996).”