POTENTIAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DISPLACEMENT OF NATIVE RED‐LEGGED FROGS BY INTRODUCED BULLFROGS

By Joseph Kiesecker, A. Blaustein, C. Miller. 2001

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f300489a918f3783d8cf8f089e5f79ee861d763

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Asymmetrical Effects of Introduced Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) on Native Ranid Frogs in Oregon (2004, background): “Rana aurora aurora remains relatively widespread in the region, and declines have not been well documented (Adams et al., 1998; Richter and Azous, 2000; but see Kiesecker et al., 2001).”
Managing supplementary feeding for avian scavengers: Guidelines for optimal design using ecological criteria (2010, background): “Consequently, and as has been observed in other interspecific competition scenarios (Petren and Case, 1996; Kieseecker et al., 2001), large aggregations of feeding individuals (up to 600 birds) of the dominant griffon vulture do not provide a framework that will satisfy the requisites of complex int”
Review: Toward management of urban ponds for freshwater biodiversity (2019, background): “Urban wetlands are also more likely to support non-native bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus; Johnson et al. 2013), a species which tends to reduce native amphibian diversity (Kiesecker et al. 2001, Rowe and Garcia 2014).”
Problems and opportunities managing invasive Bullfrogs: is there any hope? (2007, background): “Studies that quantify associations between Bullfrogs and various indigenous species (e.g. Adams 1999, Kiesecker et al. 2001) provide a ready source of data to further define habitat attributes that could increase persistence of natives if Bullfrogs are not eradicated.”
Alien predators and amphibian declines: review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation (2003, background): “While bullfrogs are thought frequently to be competitors with other amphibians (Kupferberg, 1997; Kiesecker et al., 2001b), adults are generalist predators and also feed on native amphibians (Zweifel, 1955; Beringer & Johnson, 1995; Kiesecker & Blaustein, 1997).”
Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations (2002, background): “Thus, even though hatching rates of some species may appear unaffected by ambient UV radiation in field experiments, an increasing number of studies illustrate a variety of sublethal effects caused by UV exposure (Blaustein et al. 2001b).”
Impacts from Invasive Reptiles and Amphibians (2015, background): “Passive interference by bullfrog larvae occurs because native tadpoles reduce activity levels in the presence of bullfrogs, leading to reduced survivorship, longer time tometamorphosis, and reduced size at metamorphosis, presumably as a result of starvation (Kiesecker et al. 2001).”
Effects of Urbanization on the Distribution and Abundance of Amphibians and Invasive Species in Southern California Streams (2005, background): “In arid systems, more plentiful and permanent water can allow the invasion and persistence of exotic species, which may then eat (Knapp & Matthews 2000), compete with (Kiesecker et al. 2001) or hybridize with (Riley et al. 2003) native species (reviewed in Kats & Ferrer 2003).”
Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. (2008, background): “Other structural elements of the habitat, including the spatial distribution of resources, may be important in determining species interactions and habitat use (Petren & Case 1996; Kiesecker et al. 2001; Jensen et al. 2005).”