The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States

By Thomas J. Stohlgren, D. Barnett, John Kartesz. 2003

552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f04d72b8787e516c626f12bd7ba142ac3cd7779

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Pandora's Box Contained Bait : The Global Problem of Introduced Earthworms (2008, background): “At what spatial scales are native and introduced species richness positively versus negatively correlated (Stohlgren et al. 2003)?”
Biotic interactions and plant invasions. (2006, background): “…native and introduced species richness at large spatial scales have been used to argue that native richness does not inhibit invader success (Stohlgren et al. 2003), recent analyses indicate that these positive correlations arise because both native and invader richness are correlated with…”
Non-native plant invasions of United States National Parks (2009, background): “These results support previous findings that demonstrate an increase in nonnative plant species richness with increased native plant richness (Stohlgren et al. 1999, 2003; Lonsdale 1999; Levine 2000).”
Sampling Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity (2004, unknown): “There are many other examples demonstrating that species introductions may occur without concomitant losses in native species richness (e.g. Stohlgren et al. 1999, 2003).”
Assessing the relative importance of disturbance, herbivory, diversity, and propagule pressure in exotic plant invasion (2009, background): “This inconsistency may reflect environmental factors that covary with species diversity or the scale at which these studies were conducted (Levine and D’Antonio 1999, Stohlgren et al. 2003).”
Plant species invasions along the latitudinal gradient in the United States (2006, background): “Preliminary county-level data showed that native plant species richness was positively correlated to nonnative species richness in 45 of 46 states (Stohlgren et al. 2003).”
Invasion in space and time: non‐native species richness and relative abundance respond to interannual variation in productivity and diversity (2004, background): “…observational studies, communities with high species richness tend to be the most invaded (e.g. Pickard 1984; PlantyTabacchi et al. 1996; Stohlgren et al. 1998; Wiser et al. 1998; Levine & D’Antonio 1999; Lonsdale 1999; Smith & Knapp 1999; Stohlgren et al. 1999; Levine 2000; Stohlgren et al. 2003).”
Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy (2011, unknown): “[43-45].”
Niche conservatism in non‐native birds in Europe: niche unfilling rather than niche expansion (2013, background): “Several studies found that native and non-native species richness are positively correlated as they respond similarly to environmental gradients such as energy availability (Stohlgren et al., 2003), while other findings suggest that conspecific attraction in concert with interspecific territoriality”
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning (2014, background): “A similar pattern of greater invasion into regions with greater plant diversity has been seen at larger geographic scales (Stohlgren et al. 1999, 2003).”