The labeling effect of a child benefit system

By Peter Kooreman. 2000

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eb8107efff2327c38236d9a1b5d1e0c378932b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

Farm-Level Pathways to Improved Nutritional Status: Introduction to the Special Issue (2015, background): “Looking at child benefits in the Netherlands, Kooreman (2000) finds that parents who receive the benefit – whether single or two-parent households – have a higher marginal propensity to purchase children’s clothing out of the benefit than they do for other forms of income implicitly tying the child…”
Reserving Time for Daddy: The Consequences of Fathers’ Quotas (2019, unknown): “More generally, several studies have found evidence of framing effects in income and cash transfers, wherein people do not treat labeled money as fungible and instead put most of the money toward the labeled purpose (Kooreman, 2000; Hastings and Shapiro, 2013; Beatty et al., 2014; Lange et al., 2014”
A structural labour supply model with flexible preferences (2002, background): “For example, the assumption that the husband’s and the wife’s personal incomes are perfect substitutes in the wife’s utility function is quite restrictive and has been empirically rejected (see Kooreman, 2000).”
The Impact of School Meals on School Participation: Evidence from Rural India (2011, background): “First, if the scheme creates a ‘labelling’ effect (Kooreman, 2000) and there is no reallocation of household resources away from the programme beneficiary, cooked meals may provide greater enrolment and daily participation incentive if parents perceive the programme as improving the health and…”
The American Family and Family Economics (2007, unknown): “Kooreman (2000) finds that the marginal propensity to consume child goods from Dutch child allowance payments was very large compared to expenditures out of other income, and interprets this as a “labeling” effect of policy on intrahousehold allocation.”
Migrants’ International Transfers and Educational Expenditure: Empirical Evidence from Albania (2010, background): “Among others, Case and Deaton (1998), Gitter and Barham (2008), Kooreman (2000), Moffitt (1989) and Song (2006) use single item expenditure functions.”
How Can Safety Nets Contribute to Economic Growth? (2013, background): “The amount of a transfer that is spent on human capital investments can also be enhanced by what is variously termed labeling (Kooreman, 2000) or social marketing.”
Non-Unitary Models of Household Behavior: A Survey of the Literature (2009, background): “Suppose that agents preferences have the general form (2) and that the includes Behrman (1988), Thomas (1990, 1992, 1994), Schultz (1990), Phipps and Burton (1992), Haddad and Hoddinott (1994), Du o (2000), Kooreman (2000), and Lechene and Attanassio (2002).”
Are Cash Transfers Made to Women Spent Like Other Sources of Income (2007, background): “Kooreman (2000) finds that spending on children’s clothing out of child benefit income in the Netherlands is much larger than out of other income.”