A structural labour supply model with flexible preferences

By A. Soest, M. Das, Xiaodong Gong. 2002

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ef47ffae93f908f79304524246babd6e6988faa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

The Wage Elasticity of Labour Supply: A Synthesis of Empirical Estimates (2008, methodology): “Two studies apply a non-parametric method (van Soest et al. (2002); Blomquist and Newey (2002)).”
The Marginal Cost of Public Funds in OECD Countries; Hours of Work Versus Labor Force Participation (2003, background): “Although these elasticities include the effect on both participation and hours, Van Soest’s calculations reveal that, for both spouses, the principal effect comes through the participation response.”
Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the United States (2014, background): “Similar to van Soest, Das, and Gong (2002) for the Netherlands, we experiment alternative specifi cations by increasing the order of the polynomial in the utility function: quadratic (baseline) then cubic and quartic (Rows 6 and 7 of the panels in Table A13).”
Employment, Hours of Work and the Optimal Taxation of Low Income Families (2008, unknown): “2 Blundell et al., 2000; van Soest et al., 2002).”
Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US: New Results (2012, methodology): “Similar to van Soest et al. (2002) for the Netherlands, we experiment alternative speci cations by increasing the order of the polynomial in the utility function: quadratic (baseline) then cubic and quartic (rows 6 and 7 of the panels in Table E.2).”
Welfare Reform in European Countries: A Microsimulation Analysis (2005, unknown): “Similarly, Van Soest (1995) and Van Soest et al. (2002) obtain substantial elasticities for females in the range 0.5 to 1 in a structural model for Netherlands.”