Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources

By J. Pretty. Science, 2003

1,713 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eb41b76783eb9671064848bee6f65af3ea25158

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture (2010, background): “Given the severe adverse effects of climate change on agricultural productivity in various agroecosystems, it is imperative that in addition to infrastructure investments, serious consideration be given to questions of adaptation through resilience of crops and cropping systems (Pretty, 2003).”
The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability (2011, background): “167 See section 4.3 168 Pretty (2003) 169 SR16B (Annex E refers) The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and choices for global sustainability 84 Box 4.2 The role of women in agricultural production In trying to improve the knowledge and skills base of low-income agricultural producers,…”
Social capital and soil conservation: evidence from the Philippines ∗ (2005, positive): “Pretty and Ward (2001) and Pretty (2003) have documented the growth of social capital as evidenced by group activity in a wide range of natural resource management sectors, including watershed management, irrigation, micro-finance, forest management, integrated pest management, and farmer…”
Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods (2015, background): “These networks can contribute to successful collaborative management of ecosystems by facilitating cooperation and collaboration among stakeholders (Plummer and FitzGibbon, 2006; Pretty, 2003), yet can also potentially be augmented or eroded by management initiatives (Barnes-Mauthe et al.”
RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES (2006, background): “, 2000; Armitage, 2005; Ostrom, 2005) and social capital and conflict (Ostrom and Ahn, 2003; Adger, 2003; Pretty, 2003; Galaz, 2005).”
Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter (2013, background): “Pretty (2003) observes in this respect “Without changes in social norms, people often revert to old ways when incentives end or regulations are no longer enforced, and so longterm protection may be compromised.””
A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities (2011, background): “Pretty (2003) reported that since the 1990s, up to 500,000 new local groups were established in varying environmental and social contexts.”
Transfer of Knowledge on Agroforestry Management Practices: the Structure of Farmer Advice Networks (2007, background): “Although benefits to management may be derived from increased community social capital (Grant 2001, Pretty 2003), enhanced individual social capital may indeed result in inequity within a farming community whereby certain farmers can Ecology and Society 12(2): 32…”
Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature (2007, background): “The next section begins with a review of past experiences and historical trends, then explores the various factors that influenced, shaped and conditioned these trends, and concludes with an exploration of future projections, given the status quo.”
Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence (2008, background): “These are connected and structured in networks and groups (Flora & Flora 1996; Cramb & Culasero 2003; Pretty 2003).”
Incentive-based Approaches to Sustainable Fisheries (2006, background): “These actions are facilitated by social capital within communities and by trust between management authorities and fishers (Pretty 2003; Grafton 2005), but social capital does not necessarily require the existence of individual or group harvesting rights (Dietz et al. 2003).”
Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States (2005, background): “Social capital contributes to the formation of financial and human capital, and involves mutual trust, reciprocity, groups, collective identity, a shared future vision, and working together (Pretty 2003).”
Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes (2013, background): “Local contexts might relate to lower rates of discounting the value of future resource availability, make communities responsible for broader environmental impacts (externalities), motivate sustainable resource use, increase accountability, and/or increase the salience of trust, reciprocity, and soc”
Socioeconomic factors influencing customary marine tenure in the Indo-Pacific (2005, positive): “This study found a lower proportion of immigrants in communities with highly exclusive marine tenure institutions, which is consistent with notions of high social capital being an important component of maintaining common-property management regimes (Pretty 2003).”
Social Capital and Natural Resource Management (2007, background): “…accuracy to instantly address complex issues––both theoretical and political––resulted in it being regarded as a made-to-measure terminology for the analysis of common resource management and governance (e.g., Bowles & Gintis, 2002; Isham, 2002; Ostrom, 1999; Pretty, 2003; Pretty & Ward, 2001).”