Opportunities and Challenges for use of Tumor Spheroids as Models to Test Drug Delivery and Efficacy

By G. Mehta, A. Hsiao, Marylou Ingram, G. Luker, Shuichi Takayama. Journal of Controlled Release, 2012

1,100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Multicellular spheroids are three dimensional in vitro microscale tissue analogs. The current article examines the suitability of spheroids as an in vitro platform for testing drug delivery systems. Spheroids model critical physiologic parameters present in vivo, including complex multicellular architecture, barriers to mass transport, and extracellular matrix deposition. Relative to two-dimensional cultures, spheroids also provide better target cells for drug testing and are appropriate in vitro model for studies of drug penetration. Key challenges associated with creation of uniformly sized spheroids, spheroids with small number of cells and co-culture spheroids are emphasized in the article. Moreover, the assay techniques required for the characterization of drug delivery and efficacy in spheroids and the challenges associated with such studies are discussed. Examples for the use of spheroids in drug delivery and testing are also emphasized. With these challenges and the possible solutions, multicellular spheroids are becoming an increasingly useful in vitro tool for drug screening and delivery to pathological tissues and organs.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cell Biology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eafd835ebff7d4f8935225a6306a080cba39515

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Navid Kashaninejad
  2. R. Edmondson
  3. Audrey F. Adcock
  4. Liju Yang
  5. Nam-Trung Nguyen
  6. Jessica Jenkins Broglie

In Cell Biology

  1. R. Edmondson
  2. Audrey F. Adcock
  3. Peter C. Searson
  4. Liju Yang
  5. Jessica Jenkins Broglie

In Oncology

  1. R. Edmondson
  2. Audrey F. Adcock
  3. Peter C. Searson
  4. Liju Yang
  5. Andrew D. Wong
  6. Jessica Jenkins Broglie

Citations in the corpus