Bargaining in Bicameral Legislatures: When and Why Does Malapportionment Matter?
By Stephen Ansolabehere, J. Snyder, Michael M. Ting. American Political Science Review, 2003
117 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e8ecbaaebf04013c62bfdfc62c568d6c2a3f647
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Erik Wibbels
- Friedrich Schneider
- Harald Strotmann
- Michael M. Ting
- Stephen Ansolabehere
- J. Snyder
- Hans Pitlik
- Andreas Buehn
In Political Science and International Relations
- Erik Wibbels
- Friedrich Schneider
- Michael M. Ting
- Stephen Ansolabehere
- J. Snyder
- Hans Pitlik
- James N. Druckman
- Brian G. Knight
Citations in the corpus
- MADISON IN BAGHDAD?: Decentralization and Federalism in Comparative Politics (2006, background): “Echoing research on the United States (Lee & Oppenheimer 1999, Ansolabehere et al. 2003), Stepan (1999) and Samuels & Snyder (2001) have underscored how seriously overrepresentative most federal legislative bodies are.”
- Legislative Malapportionment and the Politicization of Germany's Intergovernmental Transfer System (2006, background): “Ansolabehere, Snyder, and Ting (2003) argue that this logic does not automatically apply to”
- Legislative Bargaining under Weighted Voting (2005, background): “…Nathan Dietz (1996), Eyal Winter (1996), V. V. Chari et al. (1997), Daniel Diermeier and Timothy J. Feddersen (1998), Jeffrey S. Banks and John Duggan (2000), William LeBlanc et al. (2000), Nolan M. McCarty (2000a, 2000b), Hulya Eraslan (2002), Peter Norman (2002), and Ansolabehere et al. (2003).”