Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques

By Laurent Weill. 2004

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e874c88d9f028b745ae44816ac7db9e4b5080ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Cost, revenue and profit efficiency of Islamic versus conventional banks: International evidence using data envelopment analysis (2008, result): “…(Yudistira, 2004; Brown and Skully, 2005; Hassan, 2005; Bader, Ariff, and Taufiq, 2007), ii) studies that assess conventional banks’ efficiency (Weill, 2004; Bos and Kool, 2006; and Bader, 2007), and iii) studies that compare the efficiency of Islamic with conventional banks (Al-jarrah and…”
Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: A comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis (2014, methodology): “Furthermore, Weill (2004) also investigated two important policy issues; namely, the relationship between cost efficiency and bank size and the link between cost efficiency and bank specialization (e.g., co-operative banks, savings banks, etc.).”
The Cost Efficiency of German Banks: A Comparison of Sfa and DEA (2006, methodology): “Weill (2004) also checks the robustness of SFA, DFA and DEA.”
Cost and profit efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks in GCC countries (2010, methodology): “Our findings are consistent with many studies performed in other countries ( Weill 2004 in five European countries; Carvallo and Kasman 2005 in 16 Latin American Countries; Ariff and Can 2008 in China).”
International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis (2007, unknown): “A few studies such as Lozano-Vivas et al. (2002), Casu et al. (2004), Weill (2004) provide comparisons of various techniques, resulting in a number of applications which is higher than the number of studies.”
The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence (2010, result): “Our approach is consistent with several other studies such as Carbo et al. (2002), Maudos et al. (2002), Weill (2004), Carvallo and Kasman (2005), Becalli et al. (2006) to name a few.”
Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic banks: evidence from the Middle East (2009, result): “Studies in this group can be divided into: studies that evaluate efficiency of Islamic banks (Yudistira, 2003; Brown and Skully, 2005; Hassan, 2005; Bader, Ariff and Taufiq, 2007a); studies that assess conventional banks’ efficiency (Weill, 2004; Bos and Kool, 2006; Bader, 2007); and studies that co”
Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey (2010, unknown): “…95 applications in bank efficiency where the monetary value of deposits is part of the input vector and 20 applications where deposits are part of the output vector.10 Around 30 studies use interest expenses as an input without using the stock of deposits (e.g. Weill, 2004; Avkiran, 2009a,b).”
Convergence in banking efficiency across European countries (2009, unknown): “A couple of studies have tested the robustness of efficiency scores provided by different techniques (e.g. Bauer et al., 1998, on US banks, Weill, 2004, on European banks).”