Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.

By Dennis J. Devine, Laura D. Clayton, Benjamin B. Dunford, Rasmy Seying, J. Pryce. 2001

494 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e8118f3be957cab1df9f8f33850145597380741

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Marianne Bertrand
2. Sendhil Mullainathan
3. David S. Abrams
4. S. Bushway
5. Dan-Olof Rooth
6. Christian Hansen
7. Esther Duflo
8. David N. Figlio

In Law

1. S. Bushway
2. Marianne Bertrand
3. Crystal S. Yang
4. Jeffery T. Ulmer
5. Alma Cohen

Citations in the corpus

• Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race? (2012, background): “Given this difficulty, a number of studies (Devine et al. 2001; Sommers and Ellsworth 2000; MacCoun 1989) make use of experimental simulations of court cases, most often to understand the behavior of juries.”
• AN EXPLICIT TEST OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE “SHADOW OF THE TRIAL”† (2014, background): “One way to make our approach more realistic would be to simulate a negotiation between the actors, essentially developing the research analogy of the mock trial (see Devine et al., 2001) for the plea bargaining context.”