Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plants

By Ariel Novoplansky, D. Goldberg. 2001

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e7f66d5ba0c11ad887632d40ff1240c1a3f49e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs (2009, background): “…but also to variations in time (Sala and Lauenroth 1982; Turner and Randall 1989; Lázaro et al. 2001) in such a way that relatively small changes in rainfall frequency might have strong effects on some species, particularly seedlings of annuals (Novoplansky and Goldberg 2001; Sher et al. 2004).”
Linking growth strategies to long‐term population dynamics in a guild of desert annuals (2007, background): “…ecosystems, from short-term responses such as microbial release of nutrients and plant photosynthetic up-regulation to longer-term demographic responses such as growth, survival and recruitment (Beatley 1974; Cui & Caldwell 1997; Ostfeld & Keesing 2000; Novoplansky & Goldberg 2001; Huxman et al .”
Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments (2004, background): “As a result, plant species that are more sensitive to the interpulses are also likely to be more responsive to increases in water availability (Novoplansky and Goldberg 2001a, 2001b; Sher et al. 2004).”
Are competitive effect and response two sides of the same coin, or fundamentally different? (2010, background): “…effect and response is positive in some studies (Wilson & Keddy 1986; Goldberg & Fleetwood 1987; Miller & Werner 1987; Gurevitch et al. 1990; Novoplansky & Goldberg 2001; Thomsen, Corbin & D’Antonio 2006), it is uncorrelated in others (Peart 1989; Goldberg & Landa 1991; Cahill, Kembel &…”
Strain and vegetation effects on local limiting resources explain the outcomes of biotic interactions (2010, background): “Positive and negative outcomes of plant–plant interactions along aridity gradients are linked with complex mechanisms such as the dynamics of pulses of water availability (Novoplansky and Goldberg, 2001), strain (Table 3a, this study) and local vegetation effects on soil moisture (Sala et al.”
Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth (2011, background): “Although experiments under controlled environmental conditions can rarely be directly extrapolated to field conditions, they are useful for exploring the potential for particular factors to have an impact (Novoplansky and Goldberg 2001).”
Does pattern of soil resource heterogeneity determine plant community structure? An experimental investigation (2005, background): “The fact that species responded differently to the treatments suggests that some interspecific competitive relationships between species were affected by treatment (Fransen et al. 2001; Novoplansky & Goldberg 2001).”