Strain and vegetation effects on local limiting resources explain the outcomes of biotic interactions

By N. Gross, P. Liancourt, Philippe Choler, K. Suding, S. Lavorel. 2010

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb5313adea7eaa5fe2f44c97c9e7659a2a6d9b27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Partitioning net interactions among plants along altitudinal gradients to study community responses to climate change (2014, background): “…depending on whether changes in interactions with changing temperature or precipitation are due to environmental severity effects or neighbour trait effects, and if climate change has different effects on the level of stress experienced by the neighbour and target species (Gross et al. 2010).”
Indirect facilitation promotes macrophyte survival and growth in freshwater ecosystems threatened by eutrophication (2012, background): “Within a community, only species that have reduced levels of success (hereafter termed species deviation) are likely to benefit from facilitation (e.g. Gross et al. 2010a).”
Facilitation and the niche: implications for coexistence, range shifts and ecosystem functioning (2016, background): “Theoretical and empirical work has shown trade-offs between species competitive ability and stress tolerance (Grime 1977; Liancourt, Callaway & Michalet 2005; Gross et al. 2010).”
Uncovering multiscale effects of aridity and biotic interactions on the functional structure of Mediterranean shrublands (2013, background): “They, however, agreed with other empirical and theoretical studies conducted in water-limited systems (Maestre, Valladares & Reynolds 2005; Maestre et al. 2009b; Gross et al. 2010).”
Towards a predictive framework for biocrust mediation of plant performance: A meta‐analysis (2019, background): “…of niche-based processes once stochastic influences of species dispersal dissipate (e.g. Ferrenberg et al., 2013; Jiang & Patel, 2008) and competition and facilitation between interacting species begins structuring communities (Bruno et al., 2003; Gross et al., 2010; Liancourt et al., 2005).”
Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in abiotic factors modulate multiple ontogenetic shifts between competition and facilitation (2010, background): “Apart from the life form of the interacting species, differences in the tolerance to abiotic stress and the competitive ability of the interacting species are crucial when studying plant–plant interactions (Liancourt et al., 2005; Maestre et al., 2009a; Gross et al., 2010).”
Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress. (2013, background): “For example, studies often differ in their measures of fitness, and those reporting survival could draw different conclusions from those on growth or reproduction (Goldberg et al. 1999; Gross et al. 2010).”