An Empirical Comparison of Edge Effect Correction Methods Applied to K -function Analysis

By Ikuho Yamada, Peter A. Rogerson. 2003

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e620436967cb51348cfb835cf54600d713d9248

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. George L. W. Perry
2. Ute Hahn
3. B. Miller
4. Neal J. Enright

In Environmental Engineering

1. George L. W. Perry
2. Ute Hahn
3. B. Miller
4. Neal J. Enright

In Statistics and Probability

1. George L. W. Perry
2. Ute Hahn
3. B. Miller
4. Neal J. Enright
5. C. Basualdo

Citations in the corpus

• A Studentized Permutation Test for the Comparison of Spatial Point Patterns (2012, methodology): “Ho and Chiu ( 2009 ) and Yamada and Rogerson ( 2003 ).”
• A comparison of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial point patterns in plant ecology (2006, methodology): “Yamada and Rogerson (2003) explored the power (Type-II error rate) of the various edge corrections (in the context of Ripley’s K-function), and conclude that (i) edge-weighted and toroidal methods perform better than the guard methods, and (ii) if the purpose of an analysis is to detect/describe an…”