Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research

By L. Curry, Ingrid M. Nembhard, E. Bradley. Circulation, 2009

1,106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? (2017, methodology): “…(Hagens, Dobrow & Chafe 2009) ● Participant feedback (Curry, Nembhard & Bradley 2009) ● Participant review (Patton 2002) ● Participant validation strategies (Curry et al. 2009) ● Validation interview (Buchbinder 2011) ● Stakeholder involvement (Brandon & Fukunaga 2014) Authors using labels…”
Industrial Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0 - Systematic Review, Challenges and Outlook (2020, methodology): “The systematic literature review was conducted through a mixed-methods approach [12] (including both qualitative and quantitative research methods), following the guidelines out-lined in the PRISMA statement [13].”
Applying Constant Comparative Method with Multiple Investigators and Inter-Coder Reliability (2016, background): “Insights gained through the discussions of disagreements can be a powerful aid to understanding the patterns emerging from the data (Curry et al., 2009).”
Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal (2017, methodology): “…(Curry, Nembhard, and Bradley 2009), this research is conducted by applying the systematic literature review method through a mixed-methods approach (both the qualitative research method (Curry, Nembhard, and Bradley 2009) and the quantitative research method (Pickering and Byrne 2014)).”