BREATHING FIRE: HOW STELLAR FEEDBACK DRIVES RADIAL MIGRATION, RAPID SIZE FLUCTUATIONS, AND POPULATION GRADIENTS IN LOW-MASS GALAXIES

By K. El-Badry, Andrew Wetzel, M. Geha, P. Hopkins, D. Keres̆, Tsang Keung Chan, C. Faucher-Giguére. 2015

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We examine the effects of stellar feedback and bursty star formation on low-mass galaxies (Mstar = 2 × 106 − 5 × 1010 M⊙) using the Feedback in Realistic Environments (FIRE) simulations. While previous studies emphasized the impact of feedback on dark matter profiles, we investigate the impact on the stellar component: kinematics, radial migration, size evolution, and population gradients. Feedback-driven outflows/inflows drive significant radial stellar migration over both short and long timescales via two processes: (1) outflowing/infalling gas can remain star-forming, producing young stars that migrate ∼1 kpc within their first 100 Myr, and (2) gas outflows/inflows drive strong fluctuations in the global potential, transferring energy to all stars. These processes produce several dramatic effects. First, galaxies’ effective radii can fluctuate by factors of >2 over ∼200 Myr, and these rapid size fluctuations can account for much of the observed scatter in the radius at fixed Mstar. Second, the cumulative effects of many outflow/infall episodes steadily heat stellar orbits, causing old stars to migrate outward most strongly. This age-dependent radial migration mixes—and even inverts—intrinsic age and metallicity gradients. Thus, the galactic-archaeology approach of calculating radial star formation histories from stellar populations at z = 0 can be severely biased. These effects are strongest at Mstar ≈ 107–9.6 M⊙, the same regime where feedback most efficiently cores galaxies. Thus, detailed measurements of stellar kinematics in low-mass galaxies can strongly constrain feedback models and test baryonic solutions to small-scale problems in ΛCDM.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e0988b703f43e518f0be58eef60496ff0a9f0a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. C. Faucher-Giguére
  3. E. Quataert
  4. D. Keres̆
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  8. Volker Springel

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. James S. Bullock
  3. C. Faucher-Giguére
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. D. Keres̆
  6. E. Quataert
  7. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  8. C. Hayward

Citations in the corpus