Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints

By Joe Pater. Phonology, 2000

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e0939ed54c568dd1964b4fc7a6c72e6e3ff548a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. John J. McCarthy
2. Junko Ito
3. Armin Mester
4. M. Wolf
5. Sharon Rose
6. Rachel Walker
7. John Alderete
8. Joe Pater

In Language and Linguistics

1. John J. McCarthy
2. Junko Ito
3. Armin Mester
4. M. Wolf
5. Sharon Rose
6. Rachel Walker
7. John Alderete
8. Joe Pater

Citations in the corpus

• The extended prosodic word (2009, background): “In English (28a) and German (28b) (both standardly analyzed with trochaic foot structure and a right-aligned quantity-sensitive head trochee, see Pater 2000 and Alber 1998), single pretonic syllables remain stressless in initial position. fnc status: a. independent [,fie,] [, lex,] b. fused Lo f i…”
• OT constraints are categorical (2003, background): “Another possibility is that -la’s cost is measured by output–output faithfulness to stress (Kenstowicz 1996, 1997, Benua 1997, Alber 1998, Kager 2000, McCarthy 2000b, Pater 2000) or paradigm uniformity (Raffelsiefen 1995, 1999, Kenstowicz 1996: 385, McCarthy 1998).”
• Head Dependence in Stress‐Epenthesis Interaction (2008, methodology): “…have been used in nonderivational approaches to prosodic circumscription effects (McCarthy 2000, McCarthy & Benua in progress, cf. Itô, Kitagawa, & Mester 1996) and in the characterization of faithfulness to underlying prosody in lexical stress systems (Alderete 1996, McCarthy 2000, Pater 2000).”
• Less than zero: Correspondence and the null output (2007, background): “Under this theory, input morphemes may be associated with one or more TAF constraints, which are literally negations of output-output faithfulness constraints (Benua 1997, Crosswhite 1998, Kager 1999, Pater 2000, and others).”
• A Typology of Consonant Agreement as Correspondence (2004, background): “Synchronic analyses of lexical exceptions include lexically specific rankings or stratified lexicons (Itô & Mester 1995, Pater 2000), or lexically specified co-phonologies (Inkelas et al. 1997).”