Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances.
By K. Paap, Hunter A. Johnson, O. Sawi. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2015
738 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dc8275c423abfa1656f2fe49312f6cfe0a2ce0d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- O. Sawi
- Scott R. Schroeder
- K. Paap
- John G. Grundy
- Ellen Bialystok
- Roman Mikulinsky
- Morgan F. Bockelman
- Regina T. Anders
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- O. Sawi
- Scott R. Schroeder
- K. Paap
- Ellen Bialystok
- John G. Grundy
- Roman Mikulinsky
- Morgan F. Bockelman
- Regina T. Anders
Citations in the corpus
- Do Bilinguals Have an Advantage in Theory of Mind? A Meta-Analysis (2018, result): “This secondary analysis, however, should be interpreted with caution, given that these studies may have violated assumptions of the Analysis of Covariance (Miller and Chapman, 2001; Paap et al., 2015).”
- The Bilingual Adaptation: How Minds Accommodate Experience (2017, background): “Some researchers have argued that brain results cannot be interpreted in that case (García-Pentón et al., 2016; Paap et al., 2015).”
- Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis (2017, background): “Recently, such failures to replicate bilingual cognitive benefits have led some to argue that there is no bilingual advantage (Gasquoine, 2016; Paap et al., 2015), sparking widespread responses to these claims (Bak, 2015; Gold, 2015; Kousaie and Taler, 2015; Woumans and Duyck, 2015).”
- No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost (2017, methodology): “Bilingual advantages in switching or mixing costs Paap, Johnson, and Sawi (2015) credit the Prior and MacWhinney (2010) study with launching a flotilla of tests for bilingual advantages in cued-switching tasks and discussed seven studies that followed in its wake.”