Comparative analysis of phylogenetic and fishing effects in life history patterns of teleost fishes
By Marie-Joëlle Rochet, P. Cornillon, Robert Sabatier, D. Pontier. 2000
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dbe18c8a16a902ea6affef314091b78b3c7ab0c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Global and Planetary Change
- Robert Arlinghaus
- P. Wright
- Theodore Garland Jr.
- Thomas Mehner
- Marie-Joëlle Rochet
- Verena M. Trenkel
- A. Geffen
- E. Rezende
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Robert Arlinghaus
- E. Rezende
- A. F. Bennett
- P. Wright
- Theodore Garland Jr.
- Thomas Mehner
- Marie-Joëlle Rochet
- Verena M. Trenkel
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding the maturation process for field investigations of fisheries-induced evolution (2007, background): “Owing to the potential longterm impact of fisheries-induced evolution on the yield of fish stocks (Conover & Munch 2002), it is essential that we evaluate the relative contributions of genetic and environmentally induced variation on the observed phenotypic changes (Rochet et al. 2000).”
- Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology (2005, methodology): “Although others exist (e.g. Thorpe et al., 1996; Rochet et al., 2000; Diniz-Filho and Torres, 2002; Paradis and Claude, 2002; Desdevises et al., 2003; Butler and King, 2004; Housworth et al., 2004), the three main phylogenetically based statistical methods are independent contrasts (IC), generalized”
- Fisheries-induced trends in reaction norms for maturation in North Sea plaice (2003, unknown): “A second important advantage of the method is that it cleanly separates changes in growth and survival from a description of the maturation process; previous empirical studies could not conclusively disentangle these aspects (Rijnsdorp, 1993a; Rochet et al., 2000; Rowell, 1993).”
- Documented and Potential Biological Impacts of Recreational Fishing: Insights for Management and Conservation (2006, background): “Selective forces may affect different species and age groups in different ways and vary with exploitation intensity, place, and season of capture, and the biotic and abiotic conditions ( Miller and Kapucinski, 1994 ; Rochet et al, 2000 ; Reznick and Ghalambor, 2005 ).”
- Effects of climate change and fisheries bycatch on Southern Ocean seabirds : a review (2012, unknown): “Such responses have experimentally or empirically been reported for a number of fish species (e.g. Reznick et al. 1990, Rochet et al. 2000), and the decrease in age at first reproduction observed in a wandering albatross Diomedea exulans population during a period of high adult mortality caused by…”
- Fish life history, angler behaviour and optimal management of recreational fisheries (2013, unknown): “in maturation), which could be important for determining a LHT’s compensatory (Rochet et al. 2000) potential and thus its predicted vulnerability, were not included in our model.”
- Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals (2003, background): “They could be tested for change with the expectation that fishing will decrease age at maturity (Trippel 1995; Rochet et al. 2000).”
- Advances in herring biology: from simple to complex, coping with plasticity and adaptability (2009, background): “Rochet et al. (2000) modelled the responses of different life-history”