Comparison of empirical propagation path loss models for fixed wireless access systems

By V. S. Abhayawardhana, Ian James Wassell, D. Crosby, M. Sellars, M. G. Brown. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005

646 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0db712dfabc483d8dd5b65348c6566e741d7757a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Theodore Ted S. Rappaport
2. Dirk Grunwald
3. D. Sicker
4. Caleb T. Phillips
5. Mathew Samimi
6. Robert W. Heath

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Theodore Ted S. Rappaport
2. George R. MacCartney
3. Shu Sun
4. Sijia Deng
5. Robert W. Heath
6. Mathew Samimi
7. Lajos Hanzo
8. Anthony Ngozichukwuka Uwaechia

Citations in the corpus

• A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods (2013, result): “7GHz [29], [2] 2001 Interium (SUI) Green-Obaidat green Basic [35] 2002 ITU-R itur Basic 1km < d < 10km; 1.”
• Indoor Office Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 28 and 73 GHz for Ultra-Dense 5G Wireless Networks (2015, background): “Different types (deterministic, empirical, and stochastic) of large-scale path loss models exist, but measurement-based path loss models provide realistic insight into propagation characteristics of a wireless channel [112], [114].”