Integrating development with conservation: A means to a conservation end, or a mean end to conservation?
By N. Salafsky. 2011
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0da14f539853e5be310e919d82b5de2c4162bef2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Global Biodiversity Conservation and the Alleviation of Poverty (2012, background): “…and development is conceptually flawed, is based on unrealistic assumptions about win–win solutions, and is doomed to reduced efficiency and effectiveness relative to the focused, independent pursuit of conservation and development objectives (e.g., McShane and Newby 2004, Salafsky 2011).”
- Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being (2011, background): “The win–win paradigm appeals to donors and avoids the potentially divisive political requirements of understanding and confronting explicit trade-offs between competing stakeholders (Wells and McShane, 2004; Salafsky, 2011).”