Why does phenology drive species distribution?

By I. Chuine. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d943bf74e9effef76fdfac18f8a3e45c8a4ef62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Mapping the Global Potential Geographical Distribution of Black Locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia L.) Using Herbarium Data and a Maximum Entropy Model (2014, background): “According to Chuine’s explanation [59] for why phenology drives species distribution, we infer that these three climatic factors may play different roles in the growth process of black locusts.”
Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges (2019, background): “…change (Cleland et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2019); (b) to couple phenology into state‐of‐the‐art Earth system models for exploring regional‐ to global‐scale carbon and water cycles and energy fluxes (Krinner et al., 2005); and (c) to predict species distributions in a changing world (Chuine, 2010).”
Are trait‐based species rankings consistent across data sets and spatial scales? (2014, background): “Although the latter is likely to vary between populations (Chuine 2010), e.”
Temperate and boreal forest tree phenology: from organ-scale processes to terrestrial ecosystem models (2016, background): “Finally, phenology has been shown to be a key determinant of tree fitness and tree species distribution (Chuine 2010).”
Phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary demographic responses to climate change: taking theory out to the field (2013, methodology): “…issues raised by case studies In this final section, we use two emblematic case studies of physiological responses to climate change (for recent reviews on phenology, see Bradshaw & Holzapfel 2008; Visser 2008; Chuine 2010) to highlight conceptual issues that deserve further theoretical attention.”
Focused identification of germplasm strategy (FIGS) detects wheat stem rust resistance linked to environmental variables (2011, background): “Compared to species distribution patterns, very few studies have been undertaken to identify key factors that influence specific trait distribution patterns (Chuine 2010).”
Spring frost and growing season length co‐control the cold range limits of broad‐leaved trees (2014, background): “Short seasons may cause failure of seed maturation (Pigott & Huntley, 1981; Chuine, 2010; for further references see Kollas et al., 2012), failure of seedling establishment (Jump et al., 2007), or late wood formation, and in general may prevent tissue maturation.”
Where, why and how? Explaining the low‐temperature range limits of temperate tree species (2016, methodology): “In the past, correlative approaches have been used to explain the range limits of individual tree species, and only a few studies have attempted a process-based approach so far (e.g. models by Chuine 2010; Morin, Augspurger & Chuine 2007).”
Temperature dependence of the reproduction niche and its relevance for plant species distributions (2012, background): “It is anticipated that the influence of reproductive processes on species range limits will become more important as the frequency of extreme high-temperature events increases (IPCC, 2007; Morin et al., 2008; Chuine, 2010), despite the possibility of genetic adaptation of phenology to global warming”
Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system (2013, background): “, 2009), and are also a key to predicting shifts n interspecific competition and species range (Morin et al., 2008; huine, 2010).”