Differentiating Peer Contexts and Risk for Adolescent Substance Use

By Andrea M. Hussong. 2002

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d909a85fec2996fc8f2b3054fbfc6d88c3174d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Michael J. Mason
2. Michael Scharkow
3. Jeremy L. Mennis
4. Thorsten Quandt
5. Ruth Festl

In Epidemiology

1. Michael J. Mason
2. Jeremy L. Mennis

In Safety Research

1. Michael J. Mason
2. Jeremy L. Mennis
3. Ruth Festl

Citations in the corpus

• Peer Influence, Internet use and Cyberbullying: A Comparison of Different Context Effects among German Adolescents (2013, background): “Regarding the influence of these peer types, several studies found that both cliques and peer crowds were influential for adolescents’ substance use (Hussong, 2002) or their risktaking behavior (Payne & Cornwell, 2007), with best friends appearing to be more powerful in these social processes.”
• People, Places, and Adolescent Substance Use: Integrating Activity Space and Social Network Data for Analyzing Health Behavior (2011, background): “…have typically focused on two distinct mechanisms: (1) social influence, indicating that adolescents’ substance use uptake occurs due to influence within the peer context; and (2) peer selection, where similar adolescents associate based on prior behaviors such as substance use (Hussong 2002).”