The food crisis, industrialized farming and the imperial regime.
By Jan Douwe van der Ploeg. 2010
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d89fcc4cce55bb306e3727e264b6d0efe632550
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Agricultural labour productivity, food prices and sustainable development impacts and indicators (2013, background): “9 These issues raise critical questions not only about global food and agricultural systems and the prospects of poor agrarian economies: they are fundamental to aspirations about standards and modes of living in developed economies too, and about structures of society and economic activity (for exa”
- Crisis? What Crisis? The Normality of the Current Food Crisis (2010, unknown): “The result is that we can no longer talk of agriculture as the be-all-and-end-all of food systems (see also Ploeg 2010, this issue ).”
- The interconnected challenges for food security from a food regimes perspective: Energy, climate and malconsumption (2013, background): “Van der Ploeg (2010) illustrates this argument with regard to the rise of asparagus farming in Peru.”
- The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: Water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade (2012, background): “Thirdly, in practice transnational companies do not pay compensation costs to the communities whose water they take away or pollute (Bakker, 2010; Van der Ploeg, 2010; Progressio et al., 2010).”
- The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring (2012, background): “18 Just as industrial agriculture has experienced a declining biophysical productivity, with soil depletion and a drop in efficiency of nitrogen use from 60 to 20 percent from the 1950s to the 1990s (van der Ploeg 2010 , 100), the expense of ‘biophysical override’ rises with the price of commodity”