Missing Data, Imputation, and the Bootstrap
By Bradley Efron. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Paul T. von Hippel
- Kosuke Imai
- Roderick J. A. Little
- Geert Molenberghs
- Victoria Savalei
- Rebecca Andridge
- Craig K. Enders
- Donald B. Rubin
Citations in the corpus
- Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years (1996, methodology): “Replicates-Another Alternative One way to try to get around these inefficiencies is to try to do first-moment proper (multiple) imputation in K non-independent samples, i.e., jackknife or bootstrap replicates (e.g., Burns 1990; Efron 1994).”
- Assessing Mediational Models: Testing and Interval Estimation for Indirect Effects (2010, background): “Bootstrapping approaches (2) are relatively straightforward to extend to missing data if computationally intensive (Efron, 1994).”
- Maximum Likelihood Multiple Imputation: Faster Imputations and Consistent Standard Errors Without Posterior Draws (2012, background): “An old knock against bootstrapped MI was that it seemed to require a large number of imputations D for each bootstrapped sample [10].”
- Improving the Synthetic Data Generation Process in Spatial Microsimulation Models (2009, methodology): “We note that alternative methods for the creation of population microdatasets include a wide variety of statistical data-imputation methods (see Efron, 1994).”
- Inference for imputation estimators (2000, methodology): “It is of some interest to compare this with the nonparametric bootstrap estimate of the standard error of β̂sex (Efron & Tibshirani, 1993, Ch. 6; Efron, 1994), since, like our standard error estimator, the bootstrap estimator is consistent for the asymptotic standard error of n1/2(β̂sex − β∗sex)…”
- Bootstrap Inference When Using Multiple Imputation (2016, methodology): “The use of the bootstrap in the context of missing data has often been viewed as a frequentist alternative to multiple imputation [12], or an option to obtain confidence intervals after single imputation [13].”
- Local multiple imputation (2002, methodology): “The advantage of the method is that it generates samples with exactly the same range of X values as in the original sample, avoiding samples which might only poorly re(cid:176)ect the regression structure, the latter which is essential in Step 2.”
- A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response (2010, methodology): “A resampling method that allows for estimation of smooth or non-smooth statistics is the bootstrap (Efron, 1994), and its application to the hot deck was discussed by Shao & Sitter (1996) and Saigo et al. (2001).”
- The Dynamic Effect of Innovation on Market Structure (2004, background): “First, nonstationarity is an important issue.4 The usual approach to addressing nonstationarity is to filter the data in the hope of making the series mean stationary and covariance stationary.”
- International handbook of survey methodology. (2008, methodology): “A more broadly applicable but computationally-intensive approach is to use a replication technique such as balanced repeated replication, the jackknife, or the bootstrap for variance estimation, with the imputation procedure repeated separately for each replicate; see for example, Efron (1994) and S”
- Impact of the Bootstrap on Sample Surveys (2003, methodology): “For simple random sampling, Efron (1994) showed that the standard bootstrap procedure together with reimputing bootstrap datasets produces a valid approximation to the distribution of θ̂I .”
- Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data (2011, methodology): “While creative applications of bootstrapping have been developed for several application-specific missing data problems (Rubin and Schenker 1986; Rubin 1994; Efron 1994; Shao and Sitter 1996; Lahlrl 2003), but to our knowledge the technique has not been used to develop and implement a general purpos”
- A Repeated HalfSample Bootstrap and Balanced Repeated Replications for Randomly Imputed Data (2001, methodology): “There are two methods available for handling randomly imputed data for both smooth and nonsmooth estimators: the adjusted balanced repeated replication (BRR) methods proposed by Shao, Chen and Chen (1998); and the bootstrap method proposed by Shao and Sitter (1996) (see also Efron 1994)”