Predictors of academic performance of university students: An application of the goal efficacy model.

By R. Klomegah. 2007

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study (2011, background): “…have been nonetheless considered the strongest predictors of students’ performance, and their relevance has been confirmed across various samples (Burton and Dowling 2005; Klomegah 2007; Lent et al. 1984; McKenzie and Schweitzer 2001; Multon et al. 1991; Pajares 1996; Zeegers 2004; Zimmerman 2000).”
The Relationship Between Cell Phone Use and Academic Performance in a Sample of U.S. College Students (2015, background): “Research has demonstrated that efficacy beliefs are often better predictors of academic performance than other commonly used social-psychological variables (e.g., Klomegah, 2007; Paulsen & Gentry, 1995; Pintrich & Schunk, 2002).”
Ethnic and Gender Differences in First-Year College Students’ Goal Orientation, Self-Efficacy, and Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation (2014, methodology): “The MSLQ has been widely used in motivation research (Bong & Hocevar, 2002; Huang, 2008; Klomegah, 2007; McClendon, 1996) with internal consistency reliabilities from the original instrument reported to be .74 for the intrinsic subscale and .62 for extrinsic subscale.”