The Impact of Surrounding Land Use and Vegetation on Single-Family House Prices

By Yan Kestens, Marius Thériault, François Des Rosiers. 2004

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d21971648ee01cc0156142cb01d9e6aaee9172d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values (2010, background): “Kestens et al. (2004) integrated neighborhood greenspace with surrounding land-uses in a hedonic model.”
Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development (2011, background): “Landis and Zhang’s (1995) evaluation of suburban station areas in the San Francisco Bay Area BART system shows that sites closer to stations are less likely to be developed than sites further away.”
Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model (2007, background): “…can mean contiguous (Thorsnes, 2002; Hobden et al., 2004; Mooney and Eisgruber, 2001; Earnhart, 2006), or a few tens or hundreds of metres: 400 m for Geoghegan et al. (1997), 600 m for Tyrvainen and Miettinen (2000), 500 m for Bolitzer and Netusil (2000) and 100 m for Kestens et al. (2001).”
Modeling Spatial Dimensions of Housing Prices in Milwaukee, WI (2007, background): “Recent literature has expanded traditional neighborhood socioeconomic attributes to include neighborhood environmental attributes in the hedonic model (Decker et al, 2005; Geoghegan et al, 1997; Kestens et al, 2004).”
Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria (2014, background): “Slope heterogeneity can be controlled through spatial interaction effects of the spatial indicators with explanatory covariates (e.g., Kestens et al., 2004).”